Cake and Pi

273 notes

Imagine getting a letter from the boss, telling you how to vote.

Until 2010, federal law barred companies from using corporate money to endorse and campaign for political candidates — and that included urging employees to support specific politicians.

But the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has freed companies from those restrictions, and now several major companies, including Georgia-Pacific and Cintas, have sent letters or information packets to their employees suggesting — and sometimes explicitly recommending — how they should vote this fall.

In these letters, the executives complain about the costs of overregulation, the health care overhaul and possible tax increases. Some letters warn that if President Obama is re-elected, the company could be harmed, potentially jeopardizing jobs.

David A. Siegel, 77, chief executive of Westgate Resorts, a major time-share company, wrote to his 7,000 employees, saying that if Mr. Obama won, the prospect of higher taxes could hurt the company’s future.

“The economy doesn’t currently pose a threat to your job. What does threaten your job, however, is another four years of the same presidential administration,” Mr. Siegel wrote. “If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, as our current president plans, I will have no choice but to reduce the size of this company.”

In an interview, Mr. Siegel said he was not ordering his employees to vote his way. “There’s no way I can pressure anybody,” he said. “I’m not in the voting booth with them.”

Mr. Siegel added: “I really wanted them to know how I felt four more years under President Obama was going to affect them. It would be no different from telling your children: ‘Eat your spinach. It’s good for you.’ ”

Dave Robertson, the president of Koch Industries, sent an information packet and letter this month to more than 30,000 employees of a subsidiary, Georgia-Pacific, a paper and pulp company. The letter attacked government subsidies for “a few favored cronies” as well as “unprecedented regulatory burdens on businesses.”

The letter added, “Many of our more than 50,000 U.S. employees and contractors may suffer the consequences, including higher gasoline prices, runaway inflation and other ills.”

The Georgia-Pacific letter, first reported by In These Times, included a flier listing several candidates endorsed by the Koch brothers, the conservative billionaires, beginning with Mitt Romney, as well as opinion articles that the brothers had written.

Travis McKinney, a forklift driver for Georgia-Pacific in Portland, Ore., said the company’s political packet had spurred widespread discussion. “It leaves a bad taste,” Mr. McKinney said. “I won’t even wear my Obama pin to work because of the mailer.”

The New York Times, “Here’s A Memo From the Boss: Vote This Way.”

I guess Antonin Scalia and his ilk will just chalk this up to unintended consequences.  But really, it’s just a legal form of voter intimidation.  

Exercising democracy under duress.  Sounds American to me.

(via inothernews)

(via lord-kitschener)

Filed under the fuck 'just like telling children to eat spinach' my ASS

  1. thesportydykeplz reblogged this from jadedmushroom
  2. mymentalconfessional reblogged this from purgeparty
  3. trotskitty reblogged this from inothernews
  4. leftistshuffle reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  5. jadedmushroom reblogged this from hannibalisms
  6. munkymelee reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
  7. flawinthedesign reblogged this from real-news
  8. ragazza-mademoiselle reblogged this from nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident
  9. vantwinblade reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
  10. thepoliticalfreakshow reblogged this from nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident
  11. nomoretexasgovernorsforpresident reblogged this from inothernews
  12. jeguseiryn reblogged this from rainbowsandrice
  13. real-news reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  14. cakeandpi reblogged this from lord-kitschener
  15. dance-beneath-the-diamond-sky reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  16. sherhawk reblogged this from lord-kitschener
  17. regina-and-the-dragons reblogged this from teaspoon-of-salt
  18. giver-of-armbands reblogged this from lord-kitschener
  19. faethena reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  20. queermerooooar reblogged this from 6dogs9cats
  21. jay-the-intern reblogged this from lollie-lulu
  22. rainbowsandrice reblogged this from activismisawar
  23. activismisawar reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  24. lafrondeuse reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  25. teaspoon-of-salt reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  26. a-bunny-named-aryn reblogged this from hannibalisms
  27. realworldnews reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  28. hannibalisms reblogged this from lord-kitschener